CBFC U/A · BBFC 15 · IMDA NC16 · our read 12+ · read from 5 reviews and the board’s recordOur read is under the BBFC’s because the record shows mild violence and mild language and nothing stronger. The sources are below.
12+
Parents should know
Mild violence: the hero repeatedly stabs people. A gangster's rise-to-power story in coastal Andhra; the hero stabs rivals and clashes with local politicians. Also mild bad language.
Parents should know
12 and up
Mild violence
Mild language
From 5 reviews Filmi read; the age is the CBFC U/A certificate’s.
1 · CertificateCBFC U/A · 12+
2 · Filmi’s read3 of 7 categories documentedNot documented does not mean absent
Sex & nudityNot documented
Intense scenesNot documented
Drinking, smoking, drugsNot documented
Role modelsNot documented
3 · Parents’ votesNone counted yet. Yours is the slider below.
A man journeys from rags to riches with absolute grit and determination in the Eluru and Godavari coastal regions of India.
Parents ask
Answered from the record below — the certificate, the board’s cut list, and what reviewers documented.
Is Gangs of Godavari OK for kids?
Filmi puts Gangs of Godavari at 12+ — suitable for 12 and over. The CBFC certified it U/A. That comes from the certificate and from what reviewers documented, not from anyone at Filmi watching the film — every claim on this page is quoted with its source.
What age is Gangs of Godavari suitable for?
12+, based on the CBFC rating of U/A. 2 of the five content-warning categories are documented for this film.
What content should parents know about in Gangs of Godavari?
What the record shows: violence — mild; language — mild; sex or nudity — not on record; drink or drugs — not on record; frightening scenes — not on record. A category left blank means nobody documented it, not that the film is clean — the full record, quoted with sources, is on this page.
Did the censor board cut anything from Gangs of Godavari?
The CBFC certified it U/A with no published cut list. That is not the same as the film being uncut — only that no modification was published.
