← Home · Goliyon Ki Raasleela Ram-Leela · Family Room
Filmi Family Room
Is Goliyon Ki Raasleela Ram-Leela OK for kids?
Age guidance
12 and up
CBFC U/A · BBFC 15 · our read 12+ · read from 9 reviews and the board’s recordOur read is under the BBFC’s because the record shows strong violence and nothing stronger. The sources are below.
12+
Parents should know
Strong violence: the film descends into a bloody massacre. A Bollywood Romeo-and-Juliet set among two feuding, gun-toting clans: frequent shootouts and bloodshed, one scene of sexual assault, sustained romantic tension and some crude dialogue, and background drinking. Also moderate sexual content, moderate scary or upsetting scenes, moderate bad language and mild substance use.
Parents should know
12 and up
- Strong violence
- Moderate language
- Moderate sex & nudity
- Moderate intense scenes
From 9 reviews Filmi read; the age is the CBFC U/A certificate’s.
1 · CertificateCBFC U/A · 12+
2 · Filmi’s read5 of 7 categories documentedNot documented does not mean absent
Positive messagesNot documented
Role modelsNot documented
3 · Parents’ votesNone counted yet. Yours is the slider below.
Your age call
Set the age you’d allow
Drag the slider. Not set yet.
Tell other parents why · optional, 280 characters
0 / 280
ViolenceIntense scenesLanguageSex & nudityDrinking, smoking, drugsPositive messagesRole models
Posting as
Public, beside your note. Needed once you write words; an age pick alone needs none.
Your age call counts now; the levels show once three parents have rated.
Saved. One more thing, if you like — your kids’ ages.
Set once, and your vote shows other parents which ages it came from. Kept on your account; only the ages travel with your vote.
61
Summary
Ran and Leela are passionately in love with each other. The only problem is that their respective clans have been enemies for 500 years.
Filmi puts it at 12+, and the CBFC certified it U/A.
Where to watchAvailability by JustWatch · some watch links pay filmi.ai a small commission; it never changes what we show or how we score.
61
Certificates
CBFC · IndiaU/A
BBFC · UK15
Minimum age
Source: CBFC
Certificate · BBFC
15minimum age 15
source link pending
Certificate · CBFC
U/Aminimum age 12
source link pending
The record, item by item
Every piece of evidence behind the flags, quoted, with its source.
Violence · Mild · Reviewer on record
“the spurting of the blood” view the record →
Violence · Moderate · Reviewer on record
“men are smashed into rangoli, which then flies up in a riot of color” view the record →
Sex & nudity · Moderate · Reviewer on record
“a woman runs from her rapist” view the record →
Drinking, smoking, drugs · Mild · Reviewer on record
“permanently brawling, killing, drinking or loving” view the record →
Violence · Moderate · Reviewer on record
“a loopy bloodbath that -- in the end -- serves no purpose whatsoever” view the record →
Violence · Moderate · Reviewer on record
“bullets fly, blood flows and bahus become victims of evil design” view the record →
Sex & nudity · Mild · Reviewer on record
“nice doses of raunch and ras” view the record →
Violence · Moderate · Reviewer on record
“spraying bullets and shedding blood” view the record →
Sex & nudity · Moderate · Reviewer on record
“regretful backsliding into regressive, lazy use of threatened rape” view the record →
Violence · Mild · Reviewer on record
“armed to the teeth in open conflict in the streets” view the record →
Language · Mild · Reviewer on record
“cheap and cheesy double-meaning entendres” view the record →
Language · Moderate · Reviewer on record
“there are too many double meaning dialogues” view the record →
Violence · Mild · Reviewer on record
“the spurting of the blood” view the record →
Violence · Moderate · Reviewer on record
“bullets fly, blood flows and bahus become victims of evil design” view the record →
Violence · Strong · Reviewer on record
“snuffed out by violence and ugliness” view the record →
Violence · Strong · Reviewer on record
“a loopy bloodbath” view the record →
Language · Moderate · Reviewer on record
“there are too many double meaning dialogues” view the record →
Sex & nudity · Mild · Reviewer on record
“the kissing scenes just a part of the big picture”
Sex & nudity · Moderate · Reviewer on record
“fuses it with sexual tension” view the record →
Sex & nudity · Moderate · Reviewer on record
“fuses it with sexual tension”
Sex & nudity · Moderate · Reviewer on record
“a woman runs from her rapist” view the record →
Drinking, smoking, drugs · Mild · Reviewer on record
“permanently brawling, killing, drinking or loving” view the record →
Intense scenes · Moderate · Reviewer on record
“a woman runs from her rapist” view the record →
Where to watch
Availability by JustWatch · some watch links pay filmi.ai a small commission; it never changes what we show or how we score.Not streaming yet
Summary
Ran and Leela are passionately in love with each other. The only problem is that their respective clans have been enemies for 500 years.
Parents ask
Answered from the record below — the certificate, the board’s cut list, and what reviewers documented.
Is Goliyon Ki Raasleela Ram-Leela OK for kids?
Filmi puts Goliyon Ki Raasleela Ram-Leela at 12+ — suitable for 12 and over. The CBFC certified it U/A. That comes from the certificate and from what reviewers documented, not from anyone at Filmi watching the film — every claim on this page is quoted with its source.
What age is Goliyon Ki Raasleela Ram-Leela suitable for?
12+, based on the CBFC rating of U/A. 5 of the five content-warning categories are documented for this film.
What content should parents know about in Goliyon Ki Raasleela Ram-Leela?
What the record shows: violence — strong; language — moderate; sex or nudity — moderate; drink or drugs — mild; frightening scenes — moderate. A category left blank means nobody documented it, not that the film is clean — the full record, quoted with sources, is on this page.
Did the censor board cut anything from Goliyon Ki Raasleela Ram-Leela?
The CBFC certified it U/A with no published cut list. That is not the same as the film being uncut — only that no modification was published.