CBFC U/A · our read 12+ · read from 3 reviews and the board’s record
12+
Parents should know
Moderate sexual content: dialogue centers on sex as a man pressures a woman to sleep with him. A dating-app rom-com from Ghaziabad; the plot leans on lecherous uncles, an ex who cheats, sexual pressure and innuendo throughout, a comic terrorist subplot with a shooting, and one alcohol-spiking prank. Also moderate scary or upsetting scenes, mild violence, mild bad language and mild substance use.
Parents should know
12 and up
Moderate sex & nudity
Moderate intense scenes
From 3 reviews Filmi read; the age is the CBFC U/A certificate’s.
1 · CertificateCBFC U/A · 12+
2 · Filmi’s read5 of 7 categories documentedNot documented does not mean absent
Positive messagesNot documented
Role modelsNot documented
3 · Parents’ votesNone counted yet. Yours is the slider below.
A feisty girl from Ghaziabad makes her profile on an online dating app and her left and right swipes on the app lead to hilarious consequences.
Parents ask
Answered from the record below — the certificate, the board’s cut list, and what reviewers documented.
Is Indoo Ki Jawani OK for kids?
Filmi puts Indoo Ki Jawani at 12+ — suitable for 12 and over. The CBFC certified it U/A. That comes from the certificate and from what reviewers documented, not from anyone at Filmi watching the film — every claim on this page is quoted with its source.
What age is Indoo Ki Jawani suitable for?
12+, based on the CBFC rating of U/A. 5 of the five content-warning categories are documented for this film.
What content should parents know about in Indoo Ki Jawani?
What the record shows: violence — mild; language — mild; sex or nudity — moderate; drink or drugs — mild; frightening scenes — moderate. A category left blank means nobody documented it, not that the film is clean — the full record, quoted with sources, is on this page.
Did the censor board cut anything from Indoo Ki Jawani?
The CBFC certified it U/A with no published cut list. That is not the same as the film being uncut — only that no modification was published.
