CBFC U/A · our read 12+ · read from 2 reviews and the board’s record
12+
Parents should know
Moderate sexual content: the couple kiss and share light intimate scenes. A rom-com about a rival matchmaker and divorce lawyer falling for each other; critics note light kissing and intimate scenes and over-the-top language — one says skip it with family. Also moderate bad language.
Parents should know
12 and up
Moderate language
Moderate sex & nudity
From 2 reviews Filmi read; the age is the CBFC U/A certificate’s.
1 · CertificateCBFC U/A · 12+
2 · Filmi’s read2 of 7 categories documentedNot documented does not mean absent
ViolenceNot documented
Intense scenesNot documented
Drinking, smoking, drugsNot documented
Positive messagesNot documented
Role modelsNot documented
3 · Parents’ votesNone counted yet. Yours is the slider below.
When an earnest matchmaker moves into an office next to a cynical divorce attorney, their bitter conflict is complicated by a growing attraction.
Parents ask
Answered from the record below — the certificate, the board’s cut list, and what reviewers documented.
Is Plan A Plan B OK for kids?
Filmi puts Plan A Plan B at 12+ — suitable for 12 and over. The CBFC certified it U/A. That comes from the certificate and from what reviewers documented, not from anyone at Filmi watching the film — every claim on this page is quoted with its source.
What age is Plan A Plan B suitable for?
12+, based on the CBFC rating of U/A. 2 of the five content-warning categories are documented for this film.
What content should parents know about in Plan A Plan B?
What the record shows: violence — not on record; language — moderate; sex or nudity — moderate; drink or drugs — not on record; frightening scenes — not on record. A category left blank means nobody documented it, not that the film is clean — the full record, quoted with sources, is on this page.
Did the censor board cut anything from Plan A Plan B?
The CBFC certified it U/A with no published cut list. That is not the same as the film being uncut — only that no modification was published.
