CBFC U/A · BBFC 15 · IMDA NC16 · our read 12+ · read from 4 reviews and the board’s recordOur read is under the BBFC’s because the record shows strong violence and nothing stronger. The sources are below.
12+
Parents should know
Strong violence: the hero kills hundreds of armed men in his village. A mass-action political drama where a young man kidnaps two chief ministers' daughters; expect prolonged, elevated fight sequences and family-loyalty themes, with an honest businessman wrongly jailed as backstory. Also mild scary or upsetting scenes.
Parents should know
12 and up
Strong violence
From 4 reviews Filmi read; the age is the CBFC U/A certificate’s.
1 · CertificateCBFC U/A · 12+
2 · Filmi’s read4 of 7 categories documentedNot documented does not mean absent
LanguageNot documented
Sex & nudityNot documented
Drinking, smoking, drugsNot documented
3 · Parents’ votesNone counted yet. Yours is the slider below.
The prodigal son of a respected leader takes on two political rivals and forms bonds with their daughters.
Parents ask
Answered from the record below — the certificate, the board’s cut list, and what reviewers documented.
Is Skanda OK for kids?
Filmi puts Skanda at 12+ — suitable for 12 and over. The CBFC certified it U/A. That comes from the certificate and from what reviewers documented, not from anyone at Filmi watching the film — every claim on this page is quoted with its source.
What age is Skanda suitable for?
12+, based on the CBFC rating of U/A. 2 of the five content-warning categories are documented for this film.
What content should parents know about in Skanda?
What the record shows: violence — strong; language — not on record; sex or nudity — not on record; drink or drugs — not on record; frightening scenes — mild. A category left blank means nobody documented it, not that the film is clean — the full record, quoted with sources, is on this page.
Did the censor board cut anything from Skanda?
The CBFC certified it U/A with no published cut list. That is not the same as the film being uncut — only that no modification was published.